… the process of working collaboratively with groups of people who are affiliated by geographic proximity, special interests, or similar situations with respect to issues affecting their well-being.
(CDC, 1997)
• Scientific principles of engagement are derived from the disciplines of sociology, psychology, social work, organizational development, and political science. Organizing concepts are described in the scientific literature on community participation, community mobilization, constituency building, community psychology, and cultural influences.
• The art of engagement comes from the understanding, skill and sensitivity used to apply and adapt the science in order to meet the interests of the community and the purpose for the engagement.
Principles of Community Engagement (2nd Edition) is an excellent guide for understanding definitions and organizing concepts of community engagement. It provides an excellent resource for researchers wanting to incorporate engagement into the research process. Engagement can be labor-intensive, requiring dedicated resources including: time, funding, and people with the appropriate skills. This primer also provides guidance for managing organization support for community engagement.
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) provides cross-cutting standards for PCOR which cannot be met without engaging patients and stakeholders.
Identify and include outcomes the population of interest notices and cares about (e.g., survival, function, symptoms, health-related quality of life) and that inform an identified health decision. Define outcomes clearly, especially for complex conditions or outcomes that may not have established clinical criteria.
Provide information that supports the selection of outcomes as meeting the criteria of “patient-centered” and “relevant to decision makers,” such as patient and decision-maker input from meetings, surveys, or published studies. Select outcomes based on input directly elicited from patient informants and people representative of the population of interest, either in previous studies or in the proposed research.
Engage people representing the population of interest and other relevant stakeholders in ways that are appropriate and necessary in a given research context.
People representing the population of interest include individuals who have the condition or who are at risk of the condition and, as relevant, their surrogates or caregivers. Other relevant stakeholders may include clinicians, administrators, policy makers, or others involved in healthcare decision making.
Stakeholders can be engaged in the processes of:
Formulating research Questions
Defining essential characteristics of study participants, comparators and outcomes;
Identifying and selecting outcomes that the population of interest notices and cares about (e.g., survival, function, symptoms, health-related quality of life) and that inform decision making relevant to the research topic;
Monitoring study conduct and progress; and
Designing/suggesting plans for dissemination and implementation activities.
A community-based approach in which community members, organizations, and primary care practices are brought together to address health problems … and a locally developed method of engagement (Norman, et al (2013).
CRISP seminar series lecture available by clicking here . . .
Describe how patient and stakeholder partners will participate in study planning and design.
Describe how patient and stakeholder partners will participate in the study conduct.
Describe how patient and stakeholder partners will be involved in plans to disseminate study findings, and ensure that findings are communicated in understandable, usable ways.
• Reciprocal Relationships in decision-making
• Co-learning through training and educational opportunities
• Partnership where value is reflected in fair financial compensation and time commitment
• Trust, Transparency, Honesty
The PCORI Engagement Rubric outlines ways that engagement in research can occur. It provides both general guidance and suggestions for completing the four sections of the Engagement Plan required in applications for PCORI funding. The rubric is structured according to the three phases of research—planning, conduct, and dissemination—and includes a section about engagement principles. Each section includes potential engagement activities, tips for how to demonstrate those activities in an Engagement Plan, and brief examples from successful applications.
Initially, PCORI worked with the Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement to develop what we called the PCORI Patient and Family Engagement Rubric. It identified promising practices, from their first three funding cycles, engaging patients, family members, caregivers, and the organizations that represent them. They more recently revised that resource as the PCORI Engagement Rubric, emphasizing the value of engagement by all healthcare stakeholders. The revised rubric is incorporated into documents for the Fall 2014 and later funding cycles.
Despite widespread agreement that stakeholder engagement is needed in patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR), no taxonomy exists to guide researchers and policy makers on how to address this need. We followed an iterative process, including several stages of stakeholder review, to address three questions: (1) Who are the stakeholders in PCOR? (2) What roles and responsibilities can stakeholders have in PCOR? (3) How can researchers start engaging stakeholders? We introduce a flexible taxonomy called the 7Ps of Stakeholder Engagement and Six Stages of Research for identifying stakeholders and developing engagement strategies across the full spectrum of research activities. The path toward engagement will not be uniform across every research program, but this taxonomy offers a common starting point and a flexible approach.
Participatory research can elevate research relevance and effectiveness. The literature contains few first-hand descriptions of community members engaged in research. In 2003, the High Plains Research Network convened a Community Advisory Council (CAC) that quickly began providing input, feedback, innovation, and dissemination efforts. After receiving a participatory research grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention aimed at increasing colorectal cancer screening, the CAC participated in an intensive training on colon cancer prevention and spent 6 months developing a locally relevant intervention-Testing to Prevent Colon Cancer. CAC members participated in all aspects of the research including intervention messaging, survey design, recruitment, implementation, analysis and interpretation of data, and dissemination of results including presentations at national venues and coauthoring manuscripts. Our experience attests to the power of participatory research in efforts to improve health outcomes.
The Partnership of Academicians and Communities for Translation (PACT) works together to improve the health of people and reduce health disparities in Colorado and the surrounding region. We have engaged 20 existing community-academic partnerships, which encompasses more than 4 million community members, including rural, minority, and underserved populations.